We offer LOW-COST tax preparation, including free e-filing and free local tax preparation for new clients.

Key Insights on Michigan's Marijuana Tax Legal Battle

Michigan is at the heart of a significant cannabis policy confrontation, centering on a newly established 24% wholesale marijuana tax, now under constitutional scrutiny. The initial court hearings are attracting widespread attention due to potential impacts on cannabis pricing and the broader implications for voter-backed laws and tax policies nationwide.

Whether you partake in cannabis or are states away from Michigan, this legal challenge holds national relevance. The ruling might shape how other states craft, revise, and uphold their cannabis tax frameworks, possibly foretelling future legal disputes amid the rapidly evolving industry.

Image 3

Understanding Michigan's Proposal

As part of the 2025–2026 budget, Michigan legislators greenlit a 24% wholesale tax on cannabis, aimed at financing road upgrades. This tax targets the supply chain head-on, impacting products before they reach retail outlets.

Currently, Michigan enforces two other taxes:

  • 10% excise tax on consumer cannabis sales (a voter mandate from 2018)

  • 6% state sales tax. Should the new wholesale tax be enacted, it would create one of the country's most complex cannabis tax structures.

The Cannabis Industry's Challenge

The Michigan Cannabis Industry Association (MCIA) contends the new tax is unconstitutional, hinging on the argument that the 2018 voter-sanctioned marijuana legislation is protected and cannot be revised without a supermajority vote.

Under the Michigan Regulation and Taxation of Marihuana Act (MRTMA), any legislative change requires a three-fourths supermajority, but the wholesale tax passed with only a simple majority vote.

MCIA spokesperson Rose Tantraphol underscored the critical nature of these proceedings, stating, “As the leading cannabis trade association, we’re here in court fighting to protect the will of Michigan voters.” (Source: Michigan Advance)

Image 1

Industry advocates further caution that the tax increase could elevate consumer prices, burden small businesses, and drive consumers back to unregulated sources—a trend observed in high-tax locations such as California.

The State's Defense

Michigan officials argue the tax's legality on grounds that:

  • The wholesale tax is a new measure, not an alteration of the 2018 cannabis law.

  • Legislative bodies possess the authority to establish taxes to meet fiscal requirements.

  • The tax is intended for road infrastructure funding, not to modify cannabis policy.

Should judicial opinions favor the state, the tax could begin on January 1, 2026.

Consumer Impact

Americans, regardless of their proximity to Michigan, should monitor this case as cannabis tax arrangements often cross state boundaries. If the tax withstands the legal challenge:

  • Wholesale pricing will elevate.

  • Retail prices might surge to offset costs.

  • Some consumers may seek more affordable black-market options.

  • Small-scale operators may experience further market pressure.

If the judiciary overturns the tax, Michigan's existing, relatively cost-effective tax configuration would remain.

Image 2

National Significance of the Case

Though Michigan hosts the lawsuit, its ramifications reach nationwide.

1. It tests the extent of voter-endorsed laws’ resilience.

If legislative bodies can levy new taxes without supermajority consent, it could redefine how ballot initiatives are perceived and function across the United States.

2. It may shape other states’ cannabis tax strategies.

Struggling states with infrastructure funding deficits might adopt similar approaches if Michigan's legislation prevails.

3. It underscores a persistent national dilemma: diverse cannabis tax rates.

While some states, like Oregon, maintain competitive taxes, others, such as California, contend with excessive tariffs supporting vibrant illegal markets.

Michigan's lawsuit might set a precedent for framing tax disputes in other jurisdictions.

Looking Forward

A Michigan Court of Claims judge has already reviewed initial arguments and a verdict is anticipated shortly. The case could ascend to the Michigan Supreme Court.

Regardless of the verdict, the implications will be profound — not just for Michigan's cannabis enterprises but also in guiding states on managing voter-supported legislation, nascent industries, and tax jurisdiction.

Share this article...

Want our best tax and bookkeeping tips and insights delivered to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Social Media

Location

Royersford, Pennsylvania 19468